[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: I screwed up, how do I recover?



To close out this thread...

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 06:33:30AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org> (2015-09-24):
> > I accidentally built grpc 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+1 against unstable. So I built
> > grpc 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2 against stable and uploaded it.
> > 
> > Rereading http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/ it looks like that's not
> > what I should have done, and it may explain why a day later
> > 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2 hasn't hit the buildds or anything.
> > 
> > How should I fix this?
> 
> The .changes looks correct to me, and your package got accepted:
> | kibi@franck:~$ grep grpc_0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2_amd64.changes /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/log/current
> | 20150922213919|process-upload|dak|Processing changes file|grpc_0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2_amd64.changes
> | 20150922213922|process-upload|dak|ACCEPT|grpc_0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2_amd64.changes
> | 
> | kibi@franck:~$ dak ls grpc|grep jessie
> | grpc       | 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+1 | jessie-backports        | source
> | grpc       | 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2 | buildd-jessie-backports | source
> | grpc       | 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2 | jessie-backports        | source
> 
> I'm not sure why it's not seen by buildds/wanna-build according to [1]
> so I'm cc-ing debian-wb-team@ to get their input.
> 
>  1. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=grpc&suite=jessie-backports

It is there now. It failed to build on most architectures (including
i386) because test cases failed and on three it's missing because
libgoogle-perftools-dev is not built for the architecture.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: