To close out this thread... On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 06:33:30AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Andrew Pollock <apollock@debian.org> (2015-09-24): > > I accidentally built grpc 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+1 against unstable. So I built > > grpc 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2 against stable and uploaded it. > > > > Rereading http://backports.debian.org/Contribute/ it looks like that's not > > what I should have done, and it may explain why a day later > > 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2 hasn't hit the buildds or anything. > > > > How should I fix this? > > The .changes looks correct to me, and your package got accepted: > | kibi@franck:~$ grep grpc_0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2_amd64.changes /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/log/current > | 20150922213919|process-upload|dak|Processing changes file|grpc_0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2_amd64.changes > | 20150922213922|process-upload|dak|ACCEPT|grpc_0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2_amd64.changes > | > | kibi@franck:~$ dak ls grpc|grep jessie > | grpc | 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+1 | jessie-backports | source > | grpc | 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2 | buildd-jessie-backports | source > | grpc | 0.11.0.0-1~bpo8+2 | jessie-backports | source > > I'm not sure why it's not seen by buildds/wanna-build according to [1] > so I'm cc-ing debian-wb-team@ to get their input. > > 1. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=grpc&suite=jessie-backports It is there now. It failed to build on most architectures (including i386) because test cases failed and on three it's missing because libgoogle-perftools-dev is not built for the architecture. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature