[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ~-web-paths on wuiet



Hi again,

Am Sonntag, den 29.09.2013, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Am Sonntag, den 29.09.2013, 15:53 +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
> > Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> (2013-09-29):
> > > I heard from DSA that this is in the realm of of the wanna-build
> > > admins, but I have not heard from you. Will you be adding the userdir
> > > symlinks eventually again, or has there been a decision against that?
> > 
> > from a bystander's point of view, it looks to me like there's a general
> > consensus that features should get merged into proper infra instead of
> > living their lives in per-user directories. Maintaining a playground for
> > a given timeframe could be doable, but would mean some maintenance
> > overhead, and people writing some code. I think getting your features
> > merged into w-b proper would be best.
> 
> well, when I suggested that a while ago, there was zero interest in the
> graphs, so I concluded that it will stay a feature that I use mainly
> myself, which is fine, but at least I need the infrastructure (i.e. the
> symlink) to do that.
> 
> Also, I think it is beneficial for the project if a contributor to, say,
> the stats view can run and hack on a private copy in ~foo _without
> having to ask for it first_, otherwise the motivation to improve the
> package might be lost even before he can start working.

let me bump this again, as I have not received a reply. Which one of
these is it going to be?

     A. You want the buildd graphs on buildd.debian.org proper. For
        that, tell me where I should put it. I’ll happily beef it up to
        not special-case the Haskell packages.
     B. You don’t want the feature on buildd.debian.org proper, but you
        also don’t want to enable ~-dirs. In that case, would mirroring
        the wb-database in read-only mode to, say, people.d.o or
        alioth.d.o be an option?
     C. You simply add that one symbolic link again and reproduce the
        status quo of before the grieg breakage.

Note that I do “we are going to ignore you and your work until you give
up” or “we are going to tell you that we don’t want your work to exist
at all” is not an acceptable way to treat contributors in Debian.

With best regards,
Joachim


-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: