Re: Wheezy freeze and squeeze-backports-sloppy
* Gerfried Fuchs <email@example.com> [2012-07-30 09:05:09 CEST]:
> * Philipp Kern <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2012-07-12 17:57:46 CEST]:
> > I wasn't very happy back then either. It was sort of rushed through in
> > some private IRC pings about me setting it up on the wanna-build side.
> > All I'm saying is if it would be possible to review the arguments,
> > having had the experience for one cycle.
> The arguments why it is wanted (and to some degree needed) didn't
> change since then. There are still the two groups of people who expect
> backports to be upgradeable to the next release _without_ backports, and
> those who still want to have newer versions in _after_ the release.
> Both are valid concerns, and both have their userbase.
> > It's sad that we do not currently scale on the buildd side, but that's
> > how it is.
> > (And it's likely to take a month until all buildds have implemented it,
> > given the current speed of any buildd updates needing to take place.)
> Is there anything we can help with that? (and, ouch :( )
I'd like to re-ask this question, it might went unseen. Is there
anything we can help with? postgres-9.2 was one of the things that was
asked about already, and I suspect that there are people wanting to
provide other stuff too.
Thanks for any hints in advance,
Fühlst du dich mutlos, fass endlich Mut, los |
Fühlst du dich hilflos, geh raus und hilf, los | Wir sind Helden
Fühlst du dich machtlos, geh raus und mach, los | 23.55: Alles auf Anfang
Fühlst du dich haltlos, such Halt und lass los |