On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 11:51:01AM +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: > 2012/8/18 Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>: > > 20120818015518|check-overrides|dak|removing unused override|unstable|main|dsc|afio|source|utils| > > We're only as good as the overrides. It's possible that they wrote out main to > > the files we read. After that got dropped it was immediately removed from the > > database > I see (also from buildd.d.o page). Thanks for the clarification! > Would it be preferable if we removed wrongly autobuilt binaries from unstable? Probably, given that they wouldn't be rebuilt anyway on the next upload and go out-of-date. On the buildds the possible harm is already done. (I didn't review the license, though. Given that it was in main, I expect silly changes that don't affect buildd sponsors.) Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature