On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 08:58:51PM +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > The last idea was to use the Priority field for this as it is not really > used for Sources right now (most source packages have Priority: source). > The extra sources would have Priority: extra while the "regular" source > packages would be Priority: optional. I find that very crude. It would really be an implementation detail of how to deal with the missing overrides than a way of marking not-really-part-of-the-suite source packages. > Note that we cannot guarantee anything about version numbers: a source > introduced by Built-Using might be older or newer than the regular > source package; or it might introduce packages that would otherwise not > be in the given suite. Yep. That's what concerns me from the wanna-build side. We really need a reliable way to filter them out. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature