Re: Give-backs for R packages on arm*
2012/7/15 Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>:
> Scheduling in progress.
The first schedule wasn't successful because provided fix was
incomplete. I checked the new r-base package and it's correct now.
I'm attaching a new list which should take into account uploaded
packages between today and my first list.
gb elmerfem_6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg-5.2 . armel armhf
gb erm_0.14-0-2 . armel armhf
gb fbasics_2160.81-2 . armel armhf
gb fgarch_2110.80.1-1 . armel
gb foptions_2160.81-1 . armel
gb foreign_0.8.50-1 . armel armhf
gb gtools_2.7.0-1 . armel armhf
gb hmisc_3.9-3-1 . armel armhf
gb kernsmooth_2.23-8-1 . armel armhf
gb lme4_0.999999-0-1 . armel armhf
gb lmtest_0.9.30-1 . armel armhf
gb mcmcpack_1.2-3-1 . armel armhf
gb mgcv_1.7-19-1 . armel armhf
gb nlme_3.1.104-1 . armel armhf
gb polspline_1.1.5-5 . armel armhf
gb qtl_1.23-16-1 . armel armhf
gb r-bioc-hilbertvis_1.14.0-1 . armel armhf
gb r-bioc-limma_3.12.0~dfsg-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-class_7.3-4-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-deal_1.2.34-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-epi_1.1.33-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-gam_1.06.2-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-maps_2.2-5-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-mass_7.3-19-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-msm_1.1-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-nnet_7.3-4-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-rms_3.5-0-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-slam_0.1-24-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-spatial_7.3-4-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-vegan_2.0-3-1 . armel armhf
gb r-cran-vgam_0.8-7-1 . armel armhf
gb raschsampler_0.8-5-1 . armel armhf
gb rcmdr_1.8-4-1 . armel armhf
gb rcpp_0.9.13-1 . armel armhf
gb rggobi_2.1.19-1 . armel armhf
gb rgl_0.92.892-1 . armel armhf
gb rgtk2_2.20.24-1 . armel armhf
gb rmatrix_1.0-6-1 . armel armhf
gb rmpi_0.5-9-3 . armel armhf
gb rmysql_0.9-3-1 . armel armhf
gb robustbase_0.9-2-1 . armel armhf
gb rodbc_1.3-6-1 . armel armhf
gb rpart_3.1.54-1 . armel armhf
gb rquantlib_0.3.8-2 . armel armhf
gb survival_2.36-14-1 . armel armhf
gb tseries_0.10-29-1 . armel armhf
There are a couple of packages which were removed from arm*, but I'll
track those ones after the big part of the problem is solved.
Excluding the one above, only four or five packages should be left :)
Reply to: