Re: Missing security build
Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:21:31PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > Joey Schulze <joey@infodrom.org> (15/01/2011):
> > > > we're missing a build of openoffice.org for testing-security for the
> > > > following architectures:
> > > > . armel
> > > > . mips
> > > > . kfreebsd-i386
> > > > . kfreebsd-amd64
> > > > Could you check if (a) your buildd is building testing-security and
> > > > if (b) if ooo requires manual attention? We haven't received a
> > > > failed build log for the package either, so it hasn't even tried on
> > > > these architectures.
> > > (a) kfreebsd-* apparently lack testing-security for some reason.
> > > fa{no,sch} have chroot:squeeze-security-kfreebsd-amd64-sbuild in schroot -l.
> > > fi{eld,nzi} have chroot:squeeze-security-kfreebsd-i386-sbuild in schroot -l.
> > > Not sure what's missing right now. Maybe something on the wanna-build side?
> > I guess so. Could you check with the wanna-build-team?
>
> Jan 15 12:16:42 buildd[4374]: Daemon started. (pid=4374)
> Jan 15 12:16:46 buildd[4374]: testing-security: total 1 packages to build.
> Jan 15 12:16:49 buildd[4374]: - openoffice.org:
> Jan 15 12:16:49 buildd[4374]: - status: ok
> Jan 15 12:16:49 buildd[4374]: - pkg-ver: openoffice.org_1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1
> Jan 15 12:16:49 buildd[4374]: Starting build (dist=testing-security) of openoffice.org_1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1
>
> So somebody fixed it. It's present in wanna-build and everything, so I don't
> think there's something to do for us at the moment. (I guess it was missing in
> ..builddrc then.)
Ok, I'll wait for a few days and search for the build logs then.
Let's see if it works as expected now.
Regards,
Joey
--
Open source is important from a technical angle. -- Linus Torvalds
Reply to: