Re: SPARC daily d-i builds
- To: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org>
- Cc: stappers <stappers@debian.org>, sparc <sparc@buildd.debian.org>, trave11er <jurij@debian.org>, debian-sparc <debian-sparc@lists.debian.org>, debian-boot <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>, debian-wb-team@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: SPARC daily d-i builds
- From: Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 10:47:19 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110112094719.GH12557@sym.noone.org>
- Mail-followup-to: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org>, stappers <stappers@debian.org>, sparc <sparc@buildd.debian.org>, trave11er <jurij@debian.org>, debian-sparc <debian-sparc@lists.debian.org>, debian-boot <debian-boot@lists.debian.org>, debian-wb-team@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110112014624.GC23870@thrall.0x539.de> <[🔎] 20110112005359.GX24041@debian.org> <1294780153-sup-9628@meteor.durcheinandertal.local>
- References: <1294780153-sup-9628@meteor.durcheinandertal.local> <[🔎] 20110112005359.GX24041@debian.org> <[🔎] 20110112014624.GC23870@thrall.0x539.de> <1294780153-sup-9628@meteor.durcheinandertal.local> <[🔎] 20110112005359.GX24041@debian.org> <1294780153-sup-9628@meteor.durcheinandertal.local>
Hi,
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> Due to the lack of porter and buildd admin interest there are currently no daily
> builds for the SPARC architecture. These builds will be reenable as soon as
> someone finds the time to do the necessary buildd setup.
I just ran into this yesterday when debbugging grub on Sparc:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609733
> I would also be willing to do the neccessary setup myself if someone
> provides me with the necessary access to a sparc buildd.
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I would also be willing to do the neccessary setup myself if someone
> > provides me with the necessary access to a sparc buildd.
>
> So, again, it's not about lack of interest, it's about lack of time.
... and the lack of enough disk space on a Sparc buildd:
Philipp Kern wrote:
> 15:27 < trave11er> ok, we didn't get any reply from stappers, so sparc dailies still have the old kernels, afaict
Does http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=609733 suffice
as bug report?
> 15:33 < phil> otavio: "were going to" is quite untrue. There still isn't a bug
> report, and I did report the result of my investigation, i.e. there's no space
> on the only LVMed sparc buildd we have.
> 15:37 < otavio> phil: I didn't recall about the space issue
> 15:37 < otavio> phil: indeed
>
> So meh, whatever. To my knowledge that's still true. We currently don't have
> the capacities and we admitted that. Furthermore not asking -wb-team might
> not give you answers, indeed. Sorry if I missed something along the way.
So how much disk space is needed for building the daily images, why
does it have to be on a buildd (i.e. does it suffice to throw hardware
at it) and how new/fast does the sparc to be?
I do have a bunch of Sparcs at home which are not in use yet, but most
of them are Ultra 5 and 10 which should be around 15 years old or
older. I also have one dual processor sparc built by Tritec which I
haven't setup yet, so I don't know the details about processor speed
-- but I got it for free and it has/had Woody installed according to
the previous owner, so it can't be very new. (I also have some more
32-bit Sparcs, but I know that _they_ won't help. ;-)
If any of them could help I'll see what I can do (which is also mostly
a function of time.)-:
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
`- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
Reply to: