[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [buildd@toffee.einval.com: Log for given-back build of asterisk_1:1.4.21.2~dfsg-3+lenny6 on arm (dist=lenny-security)]



On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 12:03:25AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>
>> Thanks, and same for you!
>>>Can you look into the build failure below, the chroot
>>>seems hosed and IIRC you're the buildd admin.
>> Looking...
>
>>>W: Conflicting distribution: http://security-master.debian.org lenny/ Release (expected lenny but got )
>>>W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
>> Maybe this is the problem. Both toffee and cats are showing the same
>> problem in recent logs AFAICS. Has the setup of the security archive
>> on s-m changed recently?
>
>Not recently. Beginning of December. Let me cite a mail from back then:
>
>--8<------------------------schnipp------------------------->8---
>From: Joerg Jaspert <joerg@ganneff.de>
>Subject: security buildd changes
>To: wb-team@buildd.debian.org
>Cc: ftpmaster@debian.org
>Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 11:38:39 +0100
>
>Hey,
>
>we talked about it sometime more than a year ago, but now its final and
>needs to be done:
>
>buildd security lines for the security incoming MUST be
>
>deb http://security-master.debian.org/buildd-$suite /
>
>and not, as some of them have now
>
>deb http://security-master.debian.org/buildd/ $suite/
>
>(with suite one of lenny, squeeze or wheezy).
>
>Please adjust them to that.
>
>(This is the same way as on main (and bpo) archive, as our tool
>"manage-build-queues" simply does not provide a "Codename:" line, which
>is what the second line actually let apt expect. We only now switched
>security.)

Great, that seems to have fixed toffee. Doing the same on cats now too.

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.                                steve@einval.com
Google-bait:       http://www.debian.org/CD/free-linux-cd
  Debian does NOT ship free CDs. Please do NOT contact the mailing
  lists asking us to send them to you.


Reply to: