Re: binNMUs?
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 15:26:16 +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 08:19:09PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 15:31:56 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>
> > > Also, I think we still have a reason for +b(something) as sometimes we
> > > just need to rebuild on a single architecture (because something
> > > strange has happend there), and I don't want to get rid of that
> > > ability.
>
> > The more I think about it, the more I think we should move the binNMU
> > changelog out of /usr/share/doc and allow co-installation of different
> > binNMU versions of multi-arch: same packages. (IOW: agreed)
>
> Any reason not to ship it as /usr/share/doc/$pkg/changelog.$arch? (I.e., I
> think /usr/share/doc is still the right place for it, even if it can't be
> changelog.Debian.gz anymore.)
>
Depends where it's handled, and how the binNMU changelog+version end up
being passed to the build, I think.
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: