Re: Libav 0.7 FTBFS on mipsel: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips2 (mips2) `ldl $2, 7($13)'
- To: Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>
- Cc: Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, debian-wb-team@lists.debian.org, debian-mips@lists.debian.org, pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Libav 0.7 FTBFS on mipsel: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips2 (mips2) `ldl $2, 7($13)'
- From: Reinhard Tartler <siretart@tauware.de>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 12:37:49 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87zkk4vu9u.fsf@faui43f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
- Mail-followup-to: Philipp Kern <pkern@debian.org>, Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>, debian-wb-team@lists.debian.org, debian-mips@lists.debian.org, pkg-multimedia-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110724093342.GA20310@thrall.0x539.de> (Philipp Kern's message of "Sun, 24 Jul 2011 11:33:42 +0200")
- References: <[🔎] 87vcv1b8ls.fsf@faui43f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <[🔎] 8739i519eg.fsf@snail.Pool> <[🔎] 87hb6kd5qf.fsf@faui43f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <4E24679C.3000607@cavium.com> <[🔎] 87ei1mkpp1.fsf@snail.Pool> <[🔎] 20110720185245.GA9278@spike.0x539.de> <[🔎] 20110723225946.GB20956@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <[🔎] 20110724093342.GA20310@thrall.0x539.de>
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 11:33:42 (CEST), Philipp Kern wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:59:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:52:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
>> > I think that's a misconfiguration of the buildds. They're supposed to
>> > put linux32 into the schroot configuration if the kernel arch differs
>> > from the userspace arch, to get the right entry into uname.
>> Negative. The build have to work with even a complete different kernel
>> architecture.
>
> Since when do we require this? I don't think we do that. It might be a goal,
> which you are free to propose. (Mainly useful to build the right packages
> on i386 userland with an amd64 kernel.) The status quo is that such build
> failures are not RC, AFAIK.
In the mean time, I've uploaded this patch:
http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-multimedia/libav.git;a=commitdiff;h=27301ced78552bd4a95a9502cb67acd58b3fd297
As far I understand this discussion, it is no longer necessary. Please
tell me if I should revert it, or if it is a good idea nevertheless.
--
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
Reply to: