Hi, Am Montag, den 19.04.2010, 17:08 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: > Iain Lane ha scritto: > > Looks like the binNMU was built but not uploaded to the archive. I > > pinged the buildd admin about it. > > Checking the log I found that the build used the updated version of > libgh6-text-dev and libgh6-text-prof, but the old one for > libghc6-text-doc. Don't know why. > > Probably the NMU should be reissued. Do you have any advices on why the > libghc6-text-* versions were out-of-sync? no idea, but this is best discussed with debian-wb-team, thus CCing them. The relevant build log is https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=haskell-hstringtemplate&arch=mipsel&ver=0.6.2-2%2Bb1&stamp=1269505054&file=log&as=raw Under what conditions can a package be built against newer arch any packages then arch all packages from the same source? I always thought it to be safe to assume that when an arch dependent binary package is available, then corresponding arch indep packages will be up to date. (Nevertheless, I doubt that in this particular case it has an effect on the build result. The build should just be uploaded, as Iain said.) Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part