[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: language (Re: Proposal -- Interpretation of DFSG on Artificial Intelligence (AI) Models)



Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> wrote on 28/04/2025 at 19:10:35+0200:

> Russ Allbery dijo [Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 09:46:41AM -0700]:
>>>> I'm also very uncomfortable speaking about AIs similar like I don't
>>>> like the term IP=intellectual property...
>>
>>> It would be worthwhile to restrict ourselves to "LLM" for these things
>>> since "AI" is a much broader term and many other technologies (past or
>>> future) may be described as "AI" whilst not being LLMs.
>>
>>The GR as proposed would apply to a lot of things that are not LLMs,
>>though. I think the right terminology for what we're currently talking
>>about might be "machine learning model," which encompasses a wider set of
>>onstructions from processed training data without limiting them to only
>>large-language models.
>
> This is an important point, which I subscribe. Since its inception over 60
> years ago, "Artificial Intelligence" is fluffy marketspeak […]

To me, it's actually quite accurate: the intelligence is totally
artificial. :D

-- 
PEB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: