[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Q for nominees: structural reforms to delegations



Bill Allombert <ballombe@debian.org> wrote on 26/03/2025 at 19:45:04+0100:

> Le Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:55:15PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a écrit :
>> "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> wrote on 20/03/2025 at 11:38:23+0100:
>> 
>> > Dear nominees,
>> >
>> > Thank you for standing for the office of Debian Project Leader (DPL).
>> >
>> > Prompted in part by many years of reflection on the project's strengths
>> > and weaknesses, I have a slate of recommendations regarding the
>> > management of delegates under section 8 of the Debian Constitution.[1]
>> >
>> > [snip]
>> 
>> Could you ***please*** stop diverting the project's human resources (I
>> mean, volunteer's time) for the crusade you decided to run because some
>> guy in a (willingly built without any enforcement capability) team told
>> you to mind a bit before sending a mail?
>> 
>> This looks more and more like basic trolling and it's becoming irksome.
>
> You are not a nominee so you do not have to read this post.

Of course I have to, like all the rant on other lists, because this mess
is about critical aspects of the project.

> Branden has been DPL in the past, so he might very well have some
> experience to contribute.

I'm not receptive to authority arguments, which, in general are not
sensible.

Also, everybody can do well at some point and do bad later.

> Branden email are always politely worded and non-agressive

Let's agree to disagree.

> which is more than can be said of your own posts, starting with this
> one, which I am frankly unsure why you think this is acceptable on
> this list.  At the very least, this should disqualify you of
> complaining to the CT.

That's great, because I have no intent to complain to CT and I don't
even understand why you bring this matter.

-- 
PEB

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: