[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Q for nominees: structural reforms to delegations



On Wednesday, March 26, 2025 11:45:04 AM Mountain Standard Time Bill 
Allombert wrote:
> Le Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 06:55:15PM +0100, Pierre-Elliott Bécue a 
écrit :
> > "G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com> wrote on 
20/03/2025 at 11:38:23+0100:
> > > Dear nominees,
> > > 
> > > Thank you for standing for the office of Debian Project Leader
> > > (DPL).
> > > 
> > > Prompted in part by many years of reflection on the project's
> > > strengths and weaknesses, I have a slate of recommendations
> > > regarding the management of delegates under section 8 of the
> > > Debian Constitution.[1]
> > > 
> > > [snip]
> > 
> > Could you ***please*** stop diverting the project's human
> > resources (I mean, volunteer's time) for the crusade you decided
> > to run because some guy in a (willingly built without any
> > enforcement capability) team told you to mind a bit before
> > sending a mail?
> > 
> > This looks more and more like basic trolling and it's becoming
> > irksome.
> You are not a nominee so you do not have to read this post.
> 
> Branden has been DPL in the past, so he might very well have some
> experience to contribute.
> 
> Branden email are always politely worded and non-agressive which is
> more than can be said of your own posts, starting with this one,
> which I am frankly unsure why you think this is acceptable on this
> list.  At the very least, this should disqualify you of complaining
> to the CT.

I second that.  Long emails are not against the code of conduct, but 
impolite ones are.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: