Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> writes: > I really don’t think that anything I have done could be described as jamming anything > through. I feel like I opened a respectful discussion on debian-devel. When that reached > the stage where it was obvious that a consensus decision was not possible, I moved to the > appropriate place for making Debian-wide decisions, which is the GR. There was a pretty clear consensus[1]. It's just not the consensus you were looking for, so you appear to have decided to simply ignore it. That strikes me as rather rude. I suspect that you'll struggle to get the seconds to start a GR on this subject. If you do manage to start a GR, I for one will be seconding and voting for Paul Tagliamonte's alternative[2] suggestion: That we let the listmasters get on with their job in peace. If that wins, and your option ends up below FD, then you'll have succeeded in ensuring that there is far more momentum to overcome if the listmasters ever were to consider changing that section of the CoC. I suspect that your chances of getting the outcome you wish for will be much better served by not bothering the rest of us with this, and simply having a chat with the listmasters -- you never know, you might manage to become persuasive at some point. Cheers, Phil. [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2025/03/msg00269.html [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2025/03/msg00015.html -- Philip Hands -- https://hands.com/~phil
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature