Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload
On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 03:31:25PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> On 13.06.24 10:26, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Yes. A proposal that has not yet engaged with the complexities of
> > 3.0 (quilt) is not one in which we can yet have any confidence.
>
> The proposal simply intends to do whatever the uploader would do to build
> the source package from a tagged git worktree, except in a controlled and
> sandboxed environment.
>
> I fail to understand why we should have any less confidence in that than in
> whatever the uploader does manually to achieve the same result (we hope!!).
One could argue that neiter matter. It is the outcome that matters: the source
package itself. That's what gets distributed.
>
> --
> -- regards
> --
> -- Matthias Urlichs
>
--
Reply to: