Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload

[Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>]

Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> writes:

> The ftp team could ignore that too, but the ftp team could also ignore a
> GR, and I think the DPL would be well justified for removing a delegate
> either for ignoring an override in a GR or for failing to follow
> sensible policies adopted by the TC under 6.1.1.

One tiny quibble: I think section 4.1.3 of the constitution is very clear
that no, a project delegate cannot ignore a GR without ignoring the
constitution entirely, in which case they could also ignore the DPL
changing the delegation and we're in different uncharted territory.  I
think this is much more explicit than the implications of 6.1.1.

(This is just constitutional geekery and I'm sure that it won't come up in
this case.)

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org)              <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>