Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload

[Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>]

Timo Röhling writes ("Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload"):
> Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> [2024-06-13 14:23]:
> >As far as I understand in the current proposal the trigger is a
> >webhook running on Salsa after a push - have you considered instead
> >having the trigger be a stage in the salsa-ci pipeline, that would run
> >after the previous stages have completed successfully?
>
> I hate that idea. From past experience, the Salsa CI pipeline is 
> slower and much more flaky than the buildds, so I'm not going to 
> spend several hours (and retries) per upload waiting to see if the 
> Salsa CI deemed my upload worthy.

I hope Luca wasn't suggesting that Salsa CI as a blocker ought to be
mandatory.  Like so many things in this space, some people love what
others hate.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.  

Pronouns: they/he.  If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.