Quoting Luca Boccassi (2024-06-12 23:36:53) > On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 22:26, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> wrote: > > My point above, reframed to your new context, is that regardless of > > how overwhelmingly large the attack surface of GCC+linux is, the > > attack surface of GCC+linux+Gitlab is much larger, while that of > > GCC+linux+tag2upload is little larger. > > The attack surface of GCC+linux+tag2upload is orders of magnitude > larger than that of TCC+hurd+tag2upload. Are you going to advocate for > that switch to happen? If not, why? Why do you think it's worth to > deprecate Salsa because of its much larger attack surface, but it's > not worth deprecating Linux and GCC for their demonstrably much larger > attack surfaces? Could it be, maybe, perhaps, that a superficial > comparison of perceived attack surfaces alone is not really a good > metric to make a decision? You keep repeating the unsubstantiated accusation that I want Salsa dead. I do not want to kill Salsa. It is not my intention with this conversation to get rid of Salsa. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature