Re: [RFC] General Resolution to deploy tag2upload
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org> writes:
> Yes, that's the argument - all Salsa features are bad and "bloat":
> issues are bad, teams are bad, CIs are bad, merge requests are bad, the
> only thing needed is to push&pull to some git backend, everything else
> is bad and unneeded.
Doesn't the dgit server only accept signed tags? If I'm right about that,
it seems like a very coarse collaboration boundary. I'm not sure that
qualifies as push/pull in the way that you mean it. It certainly wasn't
intended as a Git hosting platform, and I think it is not obviously usable
as one because it was designed for a different purpose.
Anyway, just to make it obvious, I don't agree with that argument, none of
the dgit developers agree with it, and as I understand it neither do you.
I'm not sure that anyone in the project is seriously advocating replacing
Salsa with just a Git archive server; we may be exploring the implications
of a straw-man position.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: