I believe that Debian is both a technology project and a community.Dear Candidates, There are many people who see Debian as a technology project, with the technical goal of producing The Universal Operating System.
I believe position of DPL is more of an administrative position than a technical decision making position. If I become the DPL, I would love to hear answers for the above questions from the whole project and let us all, as a project, come up with some great solutions.What are you planning to do to Debian from a technical and technological point of view? What do we well, where do we suck on the technical site? If we do suck in some technical points, what are you planning to do to improve those things?
What is your position about technical leadership? Are our technical decision-making processes up to today's challenges?
In Debian, I do not think we need a technical leadership through a DPL. I consider this as the unique aspect of our Constitution that sets Debian apart from other distros.
In Debian, unlike other distros, every Debian Member can start
and lead the change they want in Debian. Let us take the example
of non-free firmware in Debian. It was one of the biggest
technical change in Debian, but the DPL was not the one who lead
the discussions/decision-making process. I believe the decision
making system in Debian is good enough that DPL need not be
involved in technical decision making.
Thanks for your consideration to answer these questions despite platforms containing language about this topic. Greetings Marc
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature