> In practical terms, it would probably be made easier if it was
> mandatory for all packages to be on Salsa, either in the 'debian'
> namespace or in a team namespace (but not under individual users).
Realistically, even if you decide "everything is now team maintained", if
there is only 1 person who cares about a certain package there won't be any
team member doing anything about it. So having it on salsa or whatever won't
really do much, besides being annoying for people who have to change their
workflow for no reason.
Also let's not forget that it is expected for people who are not DD to
contribute to debian, and they can only create repositories on salsa under
their own name (for good reason, mostly).
--
Salvo Tomaselli
"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno."
-- Galileo Galilei
https://ltworf.codeberg.page/Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.