On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 09:05:26AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Excuse me to insist with vocabulary, but since you've use the word "law" 6 > times above: the EU isn't a state or a nation, and doesn't make laws. We're > talking about "directives", that eventually will be implemented as laws in > each member state. This is a huge difference that make it possible to fight > the CRA at multiple levels. This also mean that the CRA wording isn't as > important as the wording of its implementation as a law in each member > state. > > Also, once the directive is passed, it's still theoretically possible to > fight its wording in each state. Seen the other way around: it's possible > that the implementation as a law in each country is worse than then > directive itself, we must pay attention to it (it's probably even more > difficult for us this way, as there will be 27 implementations to take care > of). All what you say is correct, but note that it was the same for the EUCD for example and Debian did not issue a statement. Debian did not issues statement for similar US laws either, though we participated to the "web blackout" against SOPA/PIPA but we did not do a GR beforehand. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballombe@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature