[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Call for vote: public statement about the EU Legislation "Cyber Resilience Act and Product Liability Directive"



On 11/20/23 00:21, Luca Boccassi wrote:
Second version, taking into account feedback. Looking for seconds at
this point:

     ----- GENERAL RESOLUTION STARTS -----

     Debian Public Statement about the EU Cyber Resilience Act and the
     Product Liability Directive

     The European Union is currently preparing a regulation "on horizontal
     cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements" known as
     the Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). It's currently in the final "trilogue"
     phase of the legislative process. The act includes a set of essential
     cybersecurity and vulnerability handling requirements for manufacturers.
     It will require products to be accompanied by information and
     instructions to the user. Manufacturers will need to perform risk
     assessments and produce technical documentation and for critical
     components, have third-party audits conducted. Security issues under
     active exploitation will have to be reported to European authorities
     within 24 hours (1). The CRA will be followed up by an update to the
     existing Product Liability Directive (PLD) which, among other things,
     will introduce the requirement for products on the market using software
     to be able to receive updates to address security vulnerabilities.

     Given the current state of the electronics and computing devices market,
     constellated with too many irresponsible vendors not taking taking
     enough precautions to ensure and maintain the security of their products,
     resulting in grave issues such as the plague of ransomware (that, among
     other things, has often caused public services to be severely hampered or
     shut down entirely, across the European Union and beyond, to the
     detriment of its citizens), the Debian project welcomes this initiative
     and supports its spirit and intent.

     The Debian project believes Free and Open Source Software Projects to be
     very well positioned to respond to modern challenges around security and
     accountability that these regulations aim to improve for products
     commercialized on the Single Market. Debian is well known for its
     security track record through practices of responsible disclosure and
     coordination with upstream developers and other Free and Open Source
     Software projects. The project aims to live up to the commitment made in
     the Debian Social Contract: "We will not hide problems." (2)

     The Debian project welcomes the attempt of the legislators to ensure
     that the development of Free and Open Source Software is not negatively
     affected by these regulations, as clearly expressed by the European
     Commission in response to stakeholders' requests (1) and as stated in
     Recital 10 of the preamble to the CRA:

      'In order not to hamper innovation or research, free and open-source
       software developed or supplied outside the course of a commercial
       activity should not be covered by this Regulation.'

     The Debian project however notes that not enough emphasis has been
     employed in all parts of these regulations to clearly exonerate Free
     and Open Source Software developers and maintainers from being subject
     to the same liabilities as commercial vendors, which has caused
     uncertainty and worry among such stakeholders.

     Therefore, the Debian project asks the legislators to enhance the
     text of these regulations to clarify beyond any reasonable doubt that
     Free and Open Source Software developers and contributors are not going
     to be treated as commercial vendors in the exercise of their duties when
     merely developing and publishing Free and Open Source Software, with
     special emphasis on clarifying grey areas, such as donations,
     contributions from commercial companies and developing Free and Open
     Source Software that may be later commercialised by a commercial vendor.
     It is fundamental for the interests of the European Union itself that
     Free and Open Source Software development can continue to thrive and
     produce high quality software components, applications and operating
     systems, and this can only happen if Free and Open Source Software
     developers and contributors can continue to work on these projects as
     they have been doing before these new regulations, especially but not
     exclusively in the context of nonprofit organizations, without being
     encumbered by legal requirements that are only appropriate for
     commercial companies and enterprises.

Hi,

Thanks a lot for taking the time to word out things this way.

However, I really think this text is being too nice with the EU. The feeling in short is reading:
- what you did was good
- what you did was good
- what you did was good
- oh, btw, there's room for improvement... it'd be nice if...

That's not at all my feeling about the CRA. I'm once more really unhappy about EU, I feel like we're getting trapped by big corp and their lobbying power, and we need to use stronger words.

In the absence of something better, I'll still vote for the above...

Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)


Reply to: