On Wed, 2022-08-31 at 11:19 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > However, just pushing a not-well-thought-idea: Would dak, apt, or any > other bit of our infrastructure be very angry if non-free-firmware > were to be not an additional component, but a strict subset of > non-free? > > That is, all packages accepted to non-free-firmware would still appear > as part of non-free (and thus, users having non-free listed would > still continue to receive updates). I suggested this in the earlier discussion: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/56b88c450a464743f84a2f451d20d554d81c3546.camel@debian.org It sounds like that this isn't going to happen: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1012533#25 -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part