Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> writes:
> Simon Josefsson dijo [Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 07:57:36PM +0200]:
>> > I find that if I assume the DSC points are unordered, and numbered only
>> > for reference, then there's sentences in there that support the offering
>> > of official images including firmware by default, even while considering
>> > the iso as a Debian component.
>>
>> Interesting, can you explain quoting the text supporting that?
>
> Simon, while the topic we are discussing is clearly divisive and close
> to the heart for many of us, we should try to keep the debate as civil
> as possible.
>
> No, you didn't insult anybody. But there are ways of saying the same
> without raising the confrontational threshold.
>
> Phil's text reflects on his personal opinions and reading angles ("I
> find that if I assume..."). You could probaby say "I cannot find the
> same meaning you propose, even while reading the items with random
> ordering" or something like that, and it would feel
> less... Aggressive.
>
> Thanks!
My apologies. Phil, I didn't mean to offend you, and I'm sorry if you
took it that way. I'm genuinely interested in your reading of DSC to
support including firmware in official images. Gunnar, I found your
correction confrontational to me, but I'll abstain from posting for a
couple of days to let things pass.
/Simon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature