> > I've also got concerns about batching up unrelated changes, with > > potentially controversial ones. And even if minor I'd prefer to see > > those debundled, even at the cost of additional GRs. > > If the only contentious point is the secrecy of votes, we could have an > amendment that includes all the other proposed changes, minus that one. I also agree with those, who speak against bundling. I'd like to be able to vote for something without needing to additionally vote for something else that is unrelated and I might even not want. If something is important enough to change the constitution for it, it's also important enough to have a separate vote on it.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.