[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Thanks and Decision making working group (was Re: General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board result)



Quoting Bernd Zeimetz (2021-04-20 15:26:06)
> On 2021-04-20 12:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > 
> > I genuinely think that more time preparing the ballot would have led 
> > to fewer more well-written options on the ballot, and consequently a 
> > higher likelihood that Debian would have decided to make a (more 
> > well-written) statement instead of the current outcome of not making 
> > a statement.
> 
> On th other hand this leads to even more discussion, more flame-wars 
> and maybe some other ballots that come in in a short time before the 
> voting peropd starts - which might have the same issues you've just 
> described. But without a defined time on when a vote starts, the 
> discussion will never end.
> 
> No idea on how to fix that, though. Personally I think having fixed 
> and known dates is still the best option.

I think a sensible step in the direction towards fixing the issue you 
describe is to not assume that "more discussion" necessarily leads to 
"the discussion will never end". ;-)

For my own part, by "more time preparing" I did only imply "the ordinary 
2 weeks", not "all the time in the World".


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: