Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> writes:
> This constitutional change attempts to address those issues by
>
> * separating the Technical Committee process from the General Resolution
> process since they have different needs;
> * requiring (passive) consensus among TC members that a resolution is
> ready to proceed to a vote;
> * setting a maximum discussion period for a TC resolution and then
> triggering a vote;
> * setting a maximum discussion period for a GR so that the timing of the
> vote is predictable;
> * extending the GR discussion period automatically if the ballot changes;
> * modifying the GR process to treat all ballot options equally, with a
> clearer process for addition, withdrawal, and amendment;
> * changing the default option for a GR to "none of the above"; and
> * clarifying the discretion extended to the Project Secretary.
Seconded.
Although, I think you should fix A.2.3 which currently says:
> ... sponsors stepping forward, it removed from the draft ballot.
^
which I'd suggest needs an 'is', or perhaps 'will be', between 'it' & 'removed'
Cheers, Phil.
--
|)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd.
|-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
|(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature