Re: Do we want to Handle Secret Ballots in the same GR as Voting Changes

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Do we want to Handle Secret Ballots in the same GR as Voting Changes
From: Richard Laager <rlaager@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:40:22 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 9bf4e6ef-0055-e18a-8aac-cf62fa69c58f@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] tslilx2fuo8.fsf@suchdamage.org>
References: <[🔎] tslilx2fuo8.fsf@suchdamage.org>

Your proposal seems fine at first glance. I would prefer to see thishandled as a separate GR. If they don't conflict textually, you couldrun them in parallel, but honestly I'd prefer to see them run in series.A few more weeks of delay doesn't seem to be a problem for this topic.


--
Richard

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Do we want to Handle Secret Ballots in the same GR as Voting Changes
  - From: Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Do we want to Handle Secret Ballots in the same GR as Voting Changes
Next by Date: Re: Opposing strict time limits
Previous by thread: Re: Do we want to Handle Secret Ballots in the same GR as Voting Changes
Next by thread: Re: Do we want to Handle Secret Ballots in the same GR as Voting Changes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread