On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 08:50:08PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > [...] My goal is a proposal that anyone > can support as long as they agree that: > > * We currently need an explicit and clearly-specified decision-making > process for the Technical Committee and the Developers via General > Resolution. > * The current systems for both are confusing and somewhat unclear, and > have loopholes that have caused frustration and perceptions of > unfairness in the past. > * This proposal is an incremental improvement in clarity and fairness > without losing any valuable properties of the existing systems. > > The one trade-off decision that I'm explicitly making is that, given the > past problems and complaints about issues with vote timing, I've made the > timing of votes less flexible in order to make them more predictable. sounds all very good to me, many thanks for driving this, Russ! > I would love for us to make more decisions, more quickly, and be more > willing to change them later based on further experience. I would love > for us to make more mistakes and learn from them, instead of being > unwilling to commit or to risk making anyone unhappy and thus postpone > decisions until they're no longer exciting or motivating and have become > mere drudgery. YES! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Live may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well dance!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature