[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Nuance Regarding RMS

On 2021-04-01 at 15:06, Milan Zamazal wrote:

>>>>>> "JS" == Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> writes:
>     JS> Question is, this being a process to compose a ballot for a
>     JS> vote: How to transform those observations into a text for the
>     JS> ballot?  Or if that is absurd, how else to proceed (other than
>     JS> shrug and let the boting process continue disregarding those
>     JS> observations?
> I think “The Debian Project will not issue a public statement” and “None
> of the above” are good enough ballot options for the purpose.  And
> definitely much better than voting about one’s weirdness or malice,
> directly or indirectly.

For whatever it may be worth, I parsed the original essay-mail in this
thread as being not a starting point for a ballot option, but an
attempt by one potential voter to convey his perspective on the issue to
other potential voters, and thus to potentially affect how those others
may choose to vote when the time to do so comes.

   The Wanderer

The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all
progress depends on the unreasonable man.         -- George Bernard Shaw

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: