Re: Withdrawing Proposal C; Option Ordering; CFV Timing
On 01/12/19 at 11:48 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Withdrawing Proposal C; Option Ordering; CFV Timing"):
> > The reason I didn't reorder it yet, is because it's talked about
> > like that. But I guess I can just reorder it on the page, keep the
> > letter but change the number.
>
> Yes, please, do that.
+1
Or alternatively, a weaker option would be to just add a preamble
saying:
it has been pointed out that it is a good idea to read proposals in
the following order (or its reverse): [...]
Lucas
Reply to: