First, if it does not reset the minimum discussion period, I'd like to withdraw proposal C. I think the overlap between Proposal C and F is significant and we have not identified differences that appear to be important to our community. I don't plan to make aCFV before Tuesday. Whether even that makes sense depends on what happens between now and then. I continue to believe it is very important to start voting by December 8. based on feedback received so far, I do plan to ask to extend the voting period to three weeks. Obviously others could choose to make a CFV sooner. At this point, speaking as an interested party, but not the DPL, I'd request that we not reorder the options. I've found that I need to talk in mails, IRC, notes to myself about the specific proposals by letter. I have seen others do the same. I think that the cost of confusion is high enough at this point that I'd rather not see us reorder. If you do reorder, please please don't change the web links like https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/vote_002#textf (the link to Proposal F's text). I do agree that reordering would have been nice.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature