Re: Proposal: General Resolution on Init Systems and systemd Facilities
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: Proposal: General Resolution on Init Systems and systemd Facilities"):
> Of course if the (re)implementation(s) of the (new) interface are
> complete before the time is up, there would be no reason to continue
> to delay, and blessing immediate use would be uncontroversial.
> So the delay in my text is a maximum, not a minimum.
I would be open to wording changes which change the emphasis here and
make this point clearer. (While keeping what I see as the actual
effect of the provision basically unchanged, unless someone spots
Ian Jackson <email@example.com> These opinions are my own.
If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.