Re: Amendment to Proposed GR: Declassifying parts of -private of historical interest
On Sun, 07 Aug 2016, Micha Lenk wrote:
> That would establishing some kind of "ex post facto" law (which by the
> way is prohibited in many constitutions for good reasons). I really
> don't want to leave the decision whether past messages will be
> affected or not up to the list masters.
This is why the GR text requires that at minimum DDs can object via GR.
--
Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
Your absence has gone through me
Like thread through a needle.
Everything I do is stitched with its color.
-- W. S. Merwin "Poetry in Motion" p107
Reply to: