I hereby second the proposal below: Le 02/09/2016 à 06:15, Gunnar Wolf a écrit : > Some weeks ago, Nicolas Dandrimont proposed a GR for declassifying > debian-private[1]. In the course of the following discussion, he > accepted[2] Don Armstrong's amendment[3], which intended to clarify the > meaning and implementation regarding the work of our delegates and the > powers of the DPL, and recognizing the historical value that could lie > within said list. > > [1] https://www.debian.org/vote/2016/vote_002 > [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2016/07/msg00108.html > [3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2016/07/msg00078.html > > In the process of the discussion, several people objected to the > amended wording, particularly to the fact that "sufficient time and > opportunity" might not be sufficiently bound and defined. > > I am, as some of its initial seconders, a strong believer in Nicolas' > original proposal; repealing a GR that was never implemented in the > slightest way basically means the Debian project should stop lying, > both to itself and to the whole free software community within which > it exists, about something that would be nice but is effectively not > implementable. > > While Don's proposal is a good contribution, given that in the > aforementioned GR "Further Discussion" won 134 votes against 118, I > hereby propose the following General Resolution: > > === BEGIN GR TEXT === > > Title: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private. > > 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private > list archives" is repealed. > 2. In keeping with paragraph 3 of the Debian Social Contract, Debian > Developers are strongly encouraged to use the debian-private mailing > list only for discussions that should not be disclosed. > > === END GR TEXT === > > Thanks for your consideration, > -- > Gunnar Wolf > (with thanks to Nicolas for writing the entirety of the GR text ;-) ) >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature