On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 02:43:04PM +0000, Sam Hartman wrote: > In conclusion, endless discussion is not a win. And I think this > strategic voting fix may bring us there. If I were to put together an > amendment that fixed the strictly greater issue but did not tackle the > strategic voting issue, would people second? Absolutely. Let's not fix issues unless they exist. I don't think the "strategic voting" issue exists in Debian, and so I don't think we should try to "fix" it. I accept that the off-by-one "error" exists for the TC, although I think the easier fix is to require a 2:1 supermajority for cases where the TC currently requires a 3:1 supermajority; this would again reduce the required number of votes to be more in line with what is indeed a more workable number for the TC, while not changing the semantics for regular GRs. -- It is easy to love a country that is famous for chocolate and beer -- Barack Obama, speaking in Brussels, Belgium, 2014-03-26
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature