Re: `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate?
On 28 October 2014 12:12, Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> wrote:
> This is nice and all, but how to you tell such a “sub-init” which
> services have been already started and which services it has to start
> itself?
The point of a sub-init would be to start one specific service.
Basically the idea would be that in /etc/init.d/gdm3 init script,
instead of starting the gdm daemon, one would start systemd with a
very special set of configurations (possibly even separate and
different from what one would use in a normal, systemd-based startup
of gdm). And on stopping of that service one would stop that whole
sub-init.
--
Best regards,
Aigars Mahinovs mailto:aigarius@debian.org
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
| .''`. Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) |
| : :' : Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv) |
| `. `' Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting |
| `- (http://www.aiteki.com) |
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
Reply to: