Re: Tentative summary of the amendments

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
From: Marco d'Itri <md@linux.it>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2014 15:05:09 +0100
Message-id: <20141026140509.GA1739@bongo.bofh.it>
In-reply-to: <CAL3TqXhJoj1qG_XW8AdtTToq7-vz9f5rTNiet82VnQy2gKgBDA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1414262802.4095.5.camel@gmail.com> <m2h58b$191$1@posted-at.bofh.it> <CAL3TqXhJoj1qG_XW8AdtTToq7-vz9f5rTNiet82VnQy2gKgBDA@mail.gmail.com>

On Oct 26, Flavius Bindea <flav@flav.com> wrote:

> if systemd is goinging to be the default I'll switch to another distrib.
systemd is already the default and it will still be the default no 
matter the outcome of this GR, which is about something else.

> maybe to a fork.
Cool. Debian encourages forks.

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
  - From: Svante Signell <svante.signell@gmail.com>
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
  - From: Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT>
- Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
  - From: Flavius Bindea <flav@flav.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
Next by Date: Re: Running systemd with PID != 1, coexisting with other inits
Previous by thread: Re: Tentative summary of the amendments
Next by thread: `systemd --system` as a viable way out of the systemd debate?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread