Re: GR option text on ballots

To: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Cc: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>, Neil McGovern <neilm@debian.org>, secretary@debian.org, debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GR option text on ballots
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 21:40:42 +0200
Message-id: <20141020194042.GA7079@roeckx.be>
In-reply-to: <21571.51276.966837.579236@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
References: <20141017152818.GS25032@halon.org.uk> <21569.16073.649629.48610@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20141017202805.GA10561@xanadu.blop.info> <21571.51276.966837.579236@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> 
> IMO summary lines should certainly not be written by opponents of the
> proposed option.  Please would you as Secretary confirm that you will
> seek to use a summary text that both I (as proponent) and you are
> happy with.

Please see A.2.3.

I would also like to point out that the webpage currently doesn't
name the options.

I also believe in that they should be written as neutral as
possible.

Kurt

Reply to:

References:
- Re: GR option text on ballots
  - From: Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: Alternative proposal: reaffirm maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
Next by Date: Re: [Call for seconds] The “no GR, please“ amendement.
Previous by thread: Re: GR option text on ballots
Next by thread: Re: GR option text on ballots
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread