Re: [RFC] Alternative proposal: reaffirm upstream and maintainers technical competence over the software they maintain
Luca Falavigna <dktrkranz <at> debian.org> writes:
> 2. Freedom of upstream discrection
>
> Upstream Developers considering a specific Free Software (including,
> but not limited to, a particular init system executed as PID 1)
> fundamental to deliver the best Software releases, are fully entitled
> to require, link, or depend on that Software, or portions of it.
Note that this paragraph *directly* goes against the *definition* of
a software distribution (take upstream software and integrate it with
the whole, occasionally going against upstream’s will) and towards a
unified userland.exe…
bye,
//mirabilos
Reply to: