Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
On 17 October 2014 13:27, Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> wrote:
> If it passes (which I consider to be sufficiently unlikely to wonder why
> the *censored* Ian even bothered, but whatever), _then_ these lists are the
> right places to discuss the implications. Until then, let's keep it here.
>From the discussion so far (and please correct me if I am wrong) the
only implication of this passing would be that a failure of
init-system-neutrality would now be a serious bug.
It appears that with systemd-shim this bug is now fixed for Gnome (any
other packages depending on libpam-systemd to get logind
functionality). So this should not be a blocker for jessie release.
I am not aware of any other issues that could impact this release
stemming from this.
--
Best regards,
Aigars Mahinovs mailto:aigarius@debian.org
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
| .''`. Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org) |
| : :' : Latvian Open Source Assoc. (http://www.laka.lv) |
| `. `' Linux Administration and Free Software Consulting |
| `- (http://www.aiteki.com) |
#--------------------------------------------------------------#
Reply to: