[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: non-free?

On 27/03/14 at 20:38 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 10:32 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Nice; if it really works with all RAR 3.0 archives, it might be worth
> > updating the unrar-free package description, which currently says:
> > 
> > Description-en: Unarchiver for .rar files
> >  Unrar can extract files from .rar archives. Can't handle some archives in
> >  the RAR 3.0 format, only the non-free "unrar" package can do that.
> Wrong package, you are looking at unrar not unar.

No, I'm saying that, if unar can open all RAR 3.0 archives, the
unrar-free package description should probably be updated to point to
unar rather than unrar.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: