Re: GR proposal: code of conduct
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:09:49PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: GR proposal: code of conduct"):
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:08:10PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Wouter Verhelst writes ("GR proposal: code of conduct"):
> > > > This is to propose a general resolution under §4.1.5 of the constitution
> > > > to propose a Debian code of conduct.
> > >
> > > I second this proposal.
> > I actually got a BAD signature on this.
> I think it must have been charset-mangled. Wouter's message contained
> some utf-8. My signed message has utf-8 in it since my software has
> copied the octets verbatim.
> Here is a uuencoded copy of the output I got from gnupg.
I can at least very the signature with that, and have to agree
it's some kind of mangeling gone wrong somewhere.
> Hmm. Looking at my original message in my MUA it says
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> which is not right. Perhaps your MUA has done a latin-1 to utf-8
> encoding, meaning that your copy of the signed file is in a form of
> WTF-8. If so then presumably if my message _had_ been in latin-1 with
> codepoints above 128, it would have been mishandled in the same way ?
As far as I can tell the problem is that you're not using MIME and
the same problem people have when voting using non-ASCII