[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:09:49PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: GR proposal: code of conduct"):
> > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:08:10PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > Wouter Verhelst writes ("GR proposal: code of conduct"):
> > > > This is to propose a general resolution under §4.1.5 of the constitution
> > > > to propose a Debian code of conduct.
> > > 
> > > I second this proposal.
> > 
> > I actually got a BAD signature on this.
> I think it must have been charset-mangled.  Wouter's message contained
> some utf-8.  My signed message has utf-8 in it since my software has
> copied the octets verbatim.
> Here is a uuencoded copy of the output I got from gnupg.

I can at least very the signature with that, and have to agree
it's some kind of mangeling gone wrong somewhere.

> Hmm.  Looking at my original message in my MUA it says
>   Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> which is not right.  Perhaps your MUA has done a latin-1 to utf-8
> encoding, meaning that your copy of the signed file is in a form of
> WTF-8.  If so then presumably if my message _had_ been in latin-1 with
> codepoints above 128, it would have been mishandled in the same way ?

As far as I can tell the problem is that you're not using MIME and
the same problem people have when voting using non-ASCII


Reply to: