Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 01:51:07PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > My message was, in the words of Constitution 4.2.5, an
> > announcement on a publicly-readable electronic mailing list
> > designated by the Project Leader's Delegate(s)
> > (I assume that listmaster have designated debian-vote for this purpose.)
> > There is no constitutional requirement for these things to be signed.
> > But to avoid having to have this argument, I have signed this email.
> > FAOD I restate: I hereby sponsor Matthew's GR.
> > If you would like the constitutional power to require such statements
> > to be signed, or make other requirements about formalities, that would
> > require a constitutional change. I wouldn't be opposed to that. (It
> > would make it possible to impose a format requirement, for example, so
> > that these actions could be automatically tracked.) If you think this
> > is a good idea, it could perhaps be bundled into the set of procedural
> > constitution fixes under consideration by the TC.
> I think that under A.3.4 that I have the power to decide on the