Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems
On 2 Mar 2014, at 13:36, Michael Banck <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 01, 2014 at 11:17:12AM +0000, Neil McGovern wrote:
>> I'm very wary about passing resolutions which require work from future
>> persons unidentified. Presumeably it would need a person who is a) keen
>> on the desktop system in question and also b) keen on a particular init
>> system which isn't supported by the desktop by default.
>> I'm not entirely sure that this person exists, or would be able to
>> essentially maintain that support long term, this would leave the burden
>> on the maintainer to carry something they don't care about.
> I assumed this person would be Matthew.
To do so on their own, for the entire project? I think that falls under the second part of my last sentence.