Re: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and later-no-harm

To: Thue Janus Kristensen <thuejk@gmail.com>
Cc: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and later-no-harm
From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 20:37:36 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140222193736.GA27037@roeckx.be>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CACGFXtWs4LddOEvLDH7Yc-2RA4Hu097G_ceR7+eiLYUNqvWpng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] CACGFXtWs4LddOEvLDH7Yc-2RA4Hu097G_ceR7+eiLYUNqvWpng@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 01:18:21PM +0100, Thue Janus Kristensen wrote:
> There is what I consider an unnecessary problem with later-no-harm [1] in
> Debian's use of the Condorcet voting method in the Debian Constitution
> §A.6.3 [2].

This also reminded me of 
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2013/05/msg00001.html



Kurt

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and later-no-harm
  - From: Thue Janus Kristensen <thuejk@gmail.com>

References:
- Debian's custom use of Condorcet and later-no-harm
  - From: Thue Janus Kristensen <thuejk@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and later-no-harm
Next by Date: Re: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and later-no-harm
Previous by thread: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and later-no-harm
Next by thread: Re: Debian's custom use of Condorcet and later-no-harm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread