Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 11:33:01 -0400
Message-id: <CAOKDY5Dwjwz2yjcmSdTtbcjzON8jNHjsh4QQL8t=qiDcrpesMA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <CAOKDY5B=ykj4GHSHKE93oGFsktGC-XzsB7Li2dMgTVftDUOezw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOKDY5A1yqfArNJLiz3dwAkYEN_ZXGzJUKw6SWkNaRXfwryr7w@mail.gmail.com> <20130509203028.GA7582@roeckx.be> <CAOKDY5DkXAX8aXAc=KaGXt-KX=ZnP9vL7BgrVJTMFbnyky1nGQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130510225025.GA16134@roeckx.be> <CAOKDY5Bgjhx0fGmLsZ+ywB330ZgRfAd9rUnik+1NbN+oo+7DfQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130515000121.GB21337@virgil.dodds.net> <CAOKDY5B=ykj4GHSHKE93oGFsktGC-XzsB7Li2dMgTVftDUOezw@mail.gmail.com>

I'd like to correct a typo:

I referred to a voting system that I called "Sequential ICT"  But that
wasn't what I meant.

I meant "Symmetrical ICT"

Symmetrical ICT is defined at electowiki.

Michael Ossipoff

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
  - From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com>

References:
- Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
  - From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com>
- Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
- Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
  - From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com>
- Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
  - From: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>
- Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
  - From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com>
- Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
  - From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
  - From: Michael Ossipoff <email9648742@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
Next by Date: Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
Previous by thread: Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
Next by thread: Re: Norman Petry and I (Ossipoff) recommended CSSD, but Schwartz Woodall is a better voting system for Debian
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread